|
| Home | Fiction
| Listserv | Creative
Archives | Scholarly Archives
| | Book Review Archives | Critical Essays | Contribute | Search the Site | |
|
ISBN:1889330698 |
|
| Review by: Lisa Johnson |
12/01/04 |
|
Every time I read Nancy Mairs, she shocks me with raw self-revelation. I go away from her books and forget their unrelenting focus; when I return I am renewed in my commitment to brutal honesty in writing the autobiographical body, and to the usefulness of this genre for developing new philosophies and social criticism. Mairs moves smoothly between personal details and social issuesfemale sexuality, disability, marriage, the mind-body dichotomy. She hones in on the telling moment and mines it. Indeed, Remembering the Bone House (Boston: Beacon, 1989) models the feminist project of situating knowledge, acknowledging our bodies as the lens through which we view our lives, and the material through which others categorize, evaluate, love, and dismiss us. The strength of Season of the Body emerges in passages where, like Mairs, Brenda Miller creates sharp narrative pictures of her body in particular moments and postures. In other places, Miller softens the lens and lessens her impact, creating a distance that is not her best work. In all fairness, Miller admits to a certain distance in her style of writing the body, quoting Rainer Maria Rilke:
Rilke is a favorite for epigraphs and personal ads, but I find his poems lie flat on the page, and Millers work at times follows suit, preferring the two-dimensional woman over flesh and blood. Bodies of women in paintings, novels, and photographs mesmerize Miller, and she struggles between her desire to pose like themgraceful and tragic and locked into the viewers validating gazeand the urge to tell her own bare, awkward stories. The motif of the female body as art object starts as early as the cover photograph:
As I read Season of the Body, I often felt Miller was this woman, only half-turned towards me, holding something back, vague and uncertain. She begins with powerful images from massage school, where her teacher explained how the muscles cache all the emotions a person suppresses in her life: anger, for instance, lodges in the big muscles of the arms and legs; sorrow lives deep in the chest; doubt drags down the shoulders and bends the spine. Warm metaphorically-laden moments mirror the reading process: We cupped one hand on the sacrum (holy bone in Greek), and stood there waiting for the bodys pulse to beat against our palms. But then the moment slips away, and the particular becomes general:
This turn to the general (sometimes, often) feels like a loss of traction. In describing the inevitable numbers conversation with a new lover (how many before me?)a funny, human, poignant essay topicMiller again softens the focus of her narrative gaze, replacing a single man with a more distanced they:
Despite her poetic nakedness, this passage ultimately holds back, disguising the vulnerable body of the single event with the gauzy covering of a pattern, a thing that happens regularly, something shes got a handle on. Miller speaks of herself in third person, recounting the end of a relationship as if it were a painting:
Opting for disembodied portraiture, Miller abandons the moment and the readers connection to it. More compelling are the moments when Miller lets me see her clearly, thirty-eight years old and lying in bed in broad daylight with a small lavender pillow over my eyes, like the old woman I think Im becoming, fretting over the pictures on her fridge and what they might reveal to the date shes expecting for dinner. But the tendency to assume a Matisse-like pose, all line and gesture, insists on distance. While women have been answering Helene Cixous call to write our bodies for several decades now, we still struggle to do each story justice, as Miller herself confides: Im learning there are limits to what can be told, even in languages we think we know so well. The language of the body is no exception. And we cannot be distanced in those languages. |
|