Copyright Emily Smith-Riser, 1998

Contact at eks1@flash.net

| Back to Criticism | Domestic Goddesses Home |

Do not plagiarize this paper. For information on how to properly cite the information provided here, click here.
This paper is provided for research purposes; not for a free cheat. You will fail any course where your teacher catches you plagiarizing, and he/she probably will.

KATE CHOPIN AS MODERNIST: A READING OF "LILACS" AND "TWO PORTAITS"

      Christopher Keep and Tim McLaughlin define modernism as "the radical shift in aesthetic and cultural sensibilities evident in the art and literature of the post-World War One period." Modernism breaks with Victorian bourgeois morality and rejects "nineteenth-century optimism," presenting "a profoundly pessimistic picture of a culture in disarray. This despair often results in an apparent apathy and moral relativism." Keep and McLaughlin attribute the "radical shift" to the Great War, which blew away the nineteenth century idea of a stable, meaningful world.
     Although Kate Chopin was writing before World War I, her fiction contains aspects of modernism. Similar to the modernists' experiences of World War I, Chopin saw the world she knew ravaged by war while growing up in a slave-holding and secessionist family in St. Louis. Even though she was young, she experienced war losses -- of people she knew and loved, of ideas she held dear, of security -- decades before writers like Pound, Eliot, and H.D. would experience them. We will see how, in the two sketchy, playful short stories "Lilacs" and "Two Portraits," Chopin expresses a modernist's disillusionment with Victorian society's conventions through her treatment of religion; in short, we will see that Kate Chopin was a modernist before her time.
     In "Christianity and Catholicism in the Fiction of Kate Chopin," Thomas Bonner argues that "even more intrinsic to her literary works [than the feminist themes] is the pervasive influence of Catholicism and Christianity -- forces which move her at once to conform and rebel" (125). However, it does not seem quite so simple. Certainly, Catholicism informs Chopin's writing, but it seems that Chopin reacts (or, as Bonner says, "rebels") against the patriarchal structures of society and the church. It is true, for Chopin, the struggle seems to be more intense with the church than with the societal convenances. However, it seems that in most cases the church and the convenances are inseparable. Martha Cutter states that Chopin resists the patriarchy (which can be read to include Catholicism, with its strict hierarchical structure) by the use of a "voice couvert," "which attempts to undermine patriarchal discourse through mimicry and through hollowing out the patriarchy from within its own structures" (17). Although Cutter does not discuss the two stories in question, in "Lilacs" and "Two Portraits," by questioning the religious life, Chopin also questions the patriarchal structure of Catholicism.
     To understand why Chopin chose the subject matters she did and why she seems to express a modernist sensibility, it is helpful to know some biographical details. Although authorial intent is impossible to prove, information about the author can certainly still inform a text.
     Kate Chopin was born Katherine O'Flaherty in St. Louis in 1850 to an Irish Catholic father and a French Catholic mother (Toth 24). As a young child, she was close to her father, who was evidently devout and went to mass every morning (Toth 25). At age five, the young Kate began attending school at the Sacred Heart Academy, but soon after, her father was killed in a train wreck and she returned home for two years (Toth 25-6). At this age, Kate lived in a "house of sorrow," which was "dominated by Kate's mother, grandmother, and great- grandmother, all of them highly religious widows" (Seyersted 16). According to Per Seyersted, Kate's great-grandmother educated her to face life and its problems "without embarrassment," and not to rely on appearances. Her great- grandmother told her intimate stories of "questionable nature," some about adulterous women (17).
     When she was seven, Kate returned to the Sacred Heart Academy and met Kitty Garesch, who later became a nun. The two remained life-long friends (Toth 26-7). Sacred Heart Academy was surrounded by tall lilac bushes "whose sweet fragrance scented the air after late spring rains" (Toth 84); we will see these lilacs in Chopin's story "Lilacs."
     Emily Toth describes how Kate O'Flaherty was taught to trust in God and his servants to provide for her:
For Sacred Heart girls, the Virgin Mary, the saints, and guardian angels were looked to as real people who could aid girls in distress. A child who lost a hair ribbon or a pencil learned to pray to Saint Anthony (who was also useful for avoiding temptation). our Lady of Good Success was said to help exam-takers, and Saint Cecilia was the patron saint of music -- the one who got young girls into the choir. And, of course, a girl's guardian angel occupied a place next to her in her chair in class, and on her pillow at night. (46)

This sense of security and order may have been doubted by the young Chopin, whose father had died so unexpectedly, and then shattered when her half- brother and great-grandmother died in close succession when she was twelve.
     The Civil War broke out when Kate O'Flaherty was eleven. Although Missouri never seceded, St. Louis was divided between secessionists and unionists, and the atmosphere there throughout the war was tense. The O'Flaherty family owned slaves, and Kate's half-brother joined the Confederate Army. Toth and Seyersted both write about Kate O'Flaherty tearing down a Union flag which had been hung on her house. "The flag incident made Kate O'Flaherty famous among southern sympathizers, as one who'd stood up to the Yankees    . . . Kate became known as St. Louis's 'Littlest Rebel'" (Toth 64).
Toth describes the way in which Chopin remembered the Civil War, and the effect it had on her life and writing:
In her Civil War stories, Kate O'Flaherty Chopin described what she remembered from the war: Young people dreamed of bravery and romance but got only ashes and bitter memories, and a lifetime of mourning. So many young men, like her half-brother George, had ridden off for fame and glory -- and so few had returned with minds and bodies intact. So many had not returned at all.
For the crucial years between eleven and fifteen, Kate O'Flaherty had lived in the midst of street violence, constant fear, and sudden death. She had lost her great-grandmother, her brother, and her dearest friend [Kitty Garesch's family was banished from St. Louis after refusing to swear allegiance to the Union]. For Kate, the war years brought bitter memories and never-ending grief. (70)

     After the war, at age sixteen, Kate O'Flaherty was elected by her classmates and teachers at the Sacred Heart Academy to the Children of Mary, a group of girls who possessed qualities of leadership, piety, popularity, and hard work. The Children of Mary were expected to join adult "sodalities" and devote themselves to charity. According to Toth, Chopin paid dues to the St. Louis Children of Mary Sodality for most of her adult life, but does not appear to have been an otherwise active member (74). It appears that, although a sense of duty to the Children of Mary prevailed, the substance of the commitment lost meaning for Chopin.
     Kate O'Flaherty married Oscar Chopin at Holy Angels Church in St. Louis when she was twenty years old (Toth 100). They honeymooned in Europe, where Kate Chopin continued to write in the journal she had kept occasionally as a child. On the day of the Feast of the Assumption, Chopin wrote that she and her husband had missed mass; on the same day, she recorded a story told by a Russian woman they met in Switzerland about
an old priest who made such an impressive sermon to his congregation of the sufferings of Christ, as to excite them all to tears. Seeing the affliction into which he had thrown his good people, he exclaimed: "Do not cry thus, my good children, for after all, it may not be true" (qtd. in Toth 114).
     It appears that Chopin, even at this early age, was capable not only of missing an important religious observation (the Feast of the Assumption), but also of poking fun at her professed religion. Later in life, in 1894, Chopin wrote about a visit to one of her old school- friends who had become a nun (not Kitty Garesch). She wrote about the way the Sacred Heart nuns mix the sensual with the sacred:
They kneel before the altar of a God whom they have learned to worship, and they give themselves wholly -- body and spirit into his keeping. They have only to remain faithful through the years, these modern Psyches, to the lover who lavishes all his precious gifts upon them in the darkness. (qtd. in Toth 238-9)

Then Chopin wondered
what Liza [her friend] thought as she looked into my face. I. . . do not know whether she could see that I had loved -- lovers who were not divine -- and hated and suffered and been glad. . . She, with her lover in the dark. (qtd. in Toth 239)
As she left the convent, a friend she was with asked if Chopin would not give anything to have the life of a nun. Chopin saw a dog on the sidewalk and said "I would rather be that dog." In her journal she explained that the dog's life was real, and that the nun's life was a "phantasmagoria" (qtd. in Toth 239).
     So, despite her seemingly sheltered childhood and her religious upbringing and education, Chopin had experienced much loss as a child. She also was an intellectual from a young age and read widely. According to Toth, Chopin's salon "was peopled by nonconformists who ignored or derided organized religion" (Introduction xix). It is not surprising, then, that a woman with such experiences and influences would experience religious ambivalence and doubt. This ambivalence is played out in Chopin's short fiction.
     "Lilacs," written in 1894, describes a widowed actress living in Paris, Mme. Adrienne Farival. Each spring, when the lilacs bloom, Mme. Farival leaves her worldly life and returns to the convent where she went to school as a child to spend time with the nuns. At the end of the story, she returns again but is turned away at the door. Jacqueline Olson Padgett offers some insight into the ways in which Chopin expresses her modernist sensibility in "Lilacs." Padgett reads "Lilacs" as a story fashioned around what she calls the "Virgin Mary myth" told in St. Luke's gospel of the Annunciation of the birth of Jesus made to Mary by the archangel Gabriel. Padgett says that the Annunciation story has divided women for ages on the basis of chastity, and has divided women internally into spiritual and physical selves. Because of the insistence on Mary's virginity before and after childbirth, Padgett says, the ideal virginal mother is set apart from "real women and mothers whose joyously experienced sexuality closes the doors to work within the clerical ministry even to our day" (97).
     Padgett argues that "Lilacs" is an annunciation story by pointing out that the story begins with the sentence "Mme. Adrienne Farival never announced her coming." Padgett calls this a failed annunciation, and says that "as the hope of annunciation fails, so too the coming of redemption and salvation through women and their sisterhood must fail" (98). As further proof that this is an Annunciation story, Padgett notes that Adrienne and Sister Agathe kneel together and recite the Annunciation prayer. Although it seems questionable as to whether the opening sentence and the Annunciation prayer being said can really make this an "annunciation story," in reading the story as such, Padgett offers some interesting insights into Chopin's religious conflicts.
     According to Padgett, Chopin "shows both convent and secular worlds to be worlds of meaningless rituals that bury physical and spiritual longing and satisfaction" (103). Sophie, Adrienne's maid, is used to
highlight the vanity of both worlds, for Sophie is a secular version of the sisters. Just as they have "white-capped heads," so Sophie stands before Adrienne with "her white starched cap quivering with each emphatic motion of her grizzled head." Sophie's chatter is a "litany" -- the likes of which the sisters might even have recited. And the "bottle of Chateau Yquem and a biscuit" that Adrienne asks Sophie to serve may well be a profanation of the Eucharist that the nuns receive daily. (103)

Padgett claims that the "Virgin Mary myth" "has served to divide women from such harmony [between sacred and secular], and in 'Lilacs' it serves the same function, carefully disrupting the integrated self, parting the spiritual and physical selves" (104). She says that in "Lilacs," Adrienne and Agathe (the nun) long for a union of their "disparate lives." "Both nun and secular woman appear to await a birth of a new sisterhood uniting women divided by an institution" (104). She notes that the women are described as though they might be pregnant with such a birth: the nuns are described as "expectant," and Adrienne is described as having a "rounded" figure.
     Padgett then talks about borders being crossed in the story as metaphorical borders between the physical and the spiritual: Adrienne is seen "crossing the beautiful lawn that sloped up to the convent." Sister Agathe, "more daring and impulsive than all, descended the steps and flew across the grass." Sister Agathe and Adrienne linger "long upon the footbridge that spanned the narrow stream which divided the convent grounds from the meadow beyond" (qtd. in Padgett 104-5). Padgett ends by saying that "wholeness and well-being, redemption and salvation: these are the promises of the Annunciation. In ÔLilacs' Kate Chopin questions whether such a promise is available to women separated from each other on the basis of chastity" (106).
     In her reading, Padgett's own religious prejudices appear to come forward. Her observations about the maid Sophie are astute; however, it is a stretch to claim that, through Sophie, Chopin is showing the convent world to be utterly meaningless. With the exception of the Mother Superior, the nuns are shown in a sympathetic light. In addition, Mme. Farival actually does seem to find spiritual satisfaction at the convent, but either she is too vain to allow this satisfaction to last, or, as Padgett indicates, it is impossible to have this type of experience in the secular world; thus, once Adrienne leaves the convent, she must leave the spiritual behind. Elmo Howell, in his reading of "Lilacs," offers some biographical notes. He states that, although she went to confession shortly before her death, towards the end of her life, Chopin was religiously indifferent (104). In contrast to Padgett, Howell asserts that "Mrs. Chopin shies away from making a point about religion" (105) and states that he does not believe "Lilacs" is an indictment of the church but is about Mme. Farival, an "individual soul at odds with itself" (106). In other words, he sees "Lilacs" as more of a modernist existentialist story than as a political/religious statement.
     Howell says that Mme. Farival grieves at the end when she is turned out of the convent at "her failure to incorporate and possess two forms of experience that are not compatible" (108). Padgett's reading, that the cause of this incompatibility is the Virgin Mary myth, is useful in understanding Mme. Farival's -- and Chopin's -- predicament.
     In "Lilacs," we see the patriarchal structure of society being represented by the church, and we see Chopin attempt to comment on it:
The stiff, wooden chairs, standing in rows against the walls of hall and parlor, seemed to have taken on an extra polish since she had seen them, last lilac time. And there was a new picture of Sacre Coeur hanging over the hall table. What had they done with Ste. Catherine de Sienne, who had occupied that position of honor for so many years? . . . St. Joseph's mantle had been embellished with a new coat of blue, and the aureole about his head freshly gilded. And the Blessed Virgin there neglected! . . . The Holy Mother had reason to be jealous and to complain. (132)

The row of wood chairs seems to represent the structured, orderly, authoritarian patriarchy. The female-oriented icons have been neglected or replaced. Although she is a woman, the Mother Superior, "whose dignity would not permit her to so much as step outside the door of her private apartments to welcome this old pupil" (132), also represents this male-oriented order. Chopin describes her as "dignity in person; large, uncompromising, unbending" and states that she "discussed conventional themes learnedly and prosaically" (132-3) -- further indicating that she represents les convenances, the customary societal behaviors and expectations.
     It is possible, through a reading of "Lilacs," to perceive a ray of hope in the seeming incompatibility of secular and religious aspects of the self. This hope may be in nature. We see Adrienne "contemplating old Sophie with quizzical, half-closed eyes, and pelting her with hot-house roses" (140). These artificially grown roses, representational of the secular world, are being used as ammunition against the religious world (if we accept Padgett's reading of Sophie as representational of the religious). However, these roses are contrasted with the naturally blooming lilacs. Adrienne says:
The scent of lilacs at once changed the whole current of my thoughts and my despondency. The boulevard, its noises, its passing throng, vanished from before my senses as completely as if they had been spirited away. I was standing here with my feet sunk in the green sward as they are now. I could see the sunlight glancing from that old white stone wall, could hear the notes of birds, just as we hear them now, and the humming of insects in the air. . . I became like an enrage; nothing could have kept me back. (135)

The smell of lilacs draws her to the convent, to God. However, when Adrienne tells this to the nun Agathe, she is chastised for not turning to "Our Blessed Mother" in her despondency (136). So, while nature pulls her to the convent -- the religious -- she is repelled by the convent back into the secular, since she cannot live up to the ideal of the Virgin Mary, nor can she abide by the patriarchal rules and hierarchy.
"Two Portraits," which Chopin wrote in 1895, also discusses the contrast between the religious and secular worlds. It is the story of a woman named Alberta, who is shown in two different ways in two different sections. Each section begins with the same paragraph:
Alberta, having looked not very long into life, had not looked very far. She put out her hands to touch things that pleased her and her lips to kiss them. Her eyes were deep brown wells that were drinking, drinking impressions and treasuring them in her soul. They were mysterious eyes and love looked out of them. (45)

In the first section, Alberta becomes a wanton, and in the second she becomes a nun. Although Elmo Howell claims that the story is a linear one in which a woman, who is a wanton, goes through a change and becomes a nun, a close reading reveals that the two sections describe two hypothetical ends for the same woman.
Jacqueline Olson Padgett offers a brief reading of "Two Portraits," stating that in this story the idea of an integration of spiritual and physical desire -- which is lacking in "Lilacs" -- is played out. The wanton lacks spirituality, but for the nun, "spirituality merges with physicality. . . Here, the sacred and the sensual mingle again, penetrating the life of the nun, and so identifying the ways in which flesh and desire prove redemptive. Such redemption and such harmony of spirit and flesh are blocked for the women in 'Lilacs'" (104).
     Chopin is having far too much fun with the nun, though, to seriously consider the nun's as a desirable state. In the two sections of this story, Chopin is still showing two extremes: the wanton is tormented by desire; the nun is fulfilled to a ridiculously ecstatic, orgasmic extreme -- and it is not physical, only imaginary.
     In "Two Portraits," Chopin's writing style is modernist. John Barth could be describing Chopin's short story when he describes the style of modernist writing as involving:
 the radical disruption of linear flow of narrative; the frustration of conventional expectations concerning unity and coherence of plot and character and the cause and effect development thereof; the deployment of ironic and ambiguous juxtapositions to call into question the moral and philosophical meaning of literary action; the adoption of a tone of epistemological self-mockery aimed at naive pretensions of bourgeois rationality. . . and an inclination to subjective distortion to point up the evanescence of the social world of the nineteenth-century bourgeoisie. (qtd. in Keep and McLaughlin)

Chopin, in "Two Portraits," throws out the idea of a unified, coherent plot (which confounds Elmo Howell); she uses an "ironic and ambiguous juxtaposition" by offering the reader two opposed versions of Alberta, and in doing so she distorts the bourgeois, Victorian, Catholic ideals of women.
     Yet, here again, as in "Lilacs," nature seems to offer some sort of possible redemption. Alberta the nun-to-be is shown "the creeping insects, the blades of grass, the flowers and trees, the rain-drops falling from the clouds; the sky and stars and the men and women moving on the earth" -- "God created all" (48). Nature leads one to God. However, although nature seems to offer some sort of comfortable hope, Chopin might not really have seen such hope; she may have just been playing a cynical modernist's game.
     From her early experiences with war's devastating power over human life and childhood ideals, Chopin appears to have acquired a distaste for simple answers as provided by the sensual Catholicism and Victorian conventions with which she was reared. Through her short fiction, as seen especially in "Lilacs" and "Two Portraits," Chopin plays with the discord between the religious and the secular, showing the philosophical and moral problems created by the traditional patriarchal religion and conventions. She appears to offer an answer in the natural world's power over human emotions, but even this hope is called into question through her cynical, mocking, modernist style. It seems clear that, in her writing, Chopin was preparing the way for the modernist viewpoint that would become popular twenty years after the writing of these two stories.



Works Cited

Bonner, Thomas, Jr. "Christianity and Catholicism in the Fiction of Kate Chopin." Southern Quarterly: A Journal of the Arts in the South 20 (1982): 118-125.
Chopin, Kate. "Lilacs." A Vocation and a Voice: Stories by Kate Chopin. Ed. Emily Toth. New York: Penguin, 1991. 131-146.
----. "Two Portraits (The Nun and the Wanton)." A Vocation and a Voice: Stories by Kate Chopin. Ed. Emily Toth. New York: Penguin, 1991. 45-51.
Cutter, Martha J. "Losing the Battle but Winning the War: Resistance to Patriarchal Discourse in Kate Chopin's Short Fiction." Legacy 11 (1994): 17-35.
Howell, Elmo. "Kate Chopin and the Pull of Faith: A Note on ÔLilacs.'" Southern Studies 18 (1979): 103-109.
Keep, Christopher, and Tim McLaughlin. "Modernism and the Modern Novel." Online. http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/elab/
hfl0255.html. 7 Dec. 1996.
Padgett, Jacqueline Olson. "Kate Chopin and the Literature of the Annunciation, with a Reading of ‘Lilacs.'" Louisiana Literature 11 (1994): 97-107.
Seyersted, Per. Kate Chopin: A Critical Biography. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1969.
Toth, Emily. Introduction. A Vocation and a Voice: Stories by Kate Chopin. Ed. Emily Toth. New York: Penguin, 1991. vii-xxvi.
----. Kate Chopin. New York: William Morrow, 1990.